Just at the moment I'm struggling with energy, it's not tiredness in the traditional sense, it's more a sense of being de-energised... this morning feeling incredibly down I began to reflect on just why I've been feeling so down/depressed for the last week or so... it's fair to say life isn't easy, financially things are tricky for us as a family but I began to realise that there is a deeper personal/spiritual issue for me... I'm a Pioneer, a creative etc. I need new challenges, new projects to sink my teeth into, to get my creative juices flowing again.
In the business world it seems accepted that entrepreneurs are always entrepreneurs, they specialise in "blue sky thinking" and they then work with managers and administrators... the worst thing to do with a new product/initiative is to leave it in the hands of the inventor! Yet in the Church it seems to be assumed that a pioneer will gradually morph into a manager/pastor... I'm beginning to doubt this model. There is nothing wrong with managing, and we all need to manage to some extent, but as a Pioneer I'm finding it's killing me! When I worked in the Theatre a project would last 2/3 months then it would be time to move on to the next challenge, I could never be (and never was) a stage manager who would stay with the show for the foreseeable... I had to move on... I'm beginning to realise this is my nature, I'm energised by risk, by new problems to solve, by the creative dynamic... when left to manage something I stuff it up, not by making a mess of it but because I find myself gradually drained and I lose the energy needed and I get distracted or just thoroughly demotivated... and as hard as I try I can't find energy from nowhere! With the creative bit between my teeth I get told off for being a workaholic, without it I can turn into a couch potato! I'm not sure what the answer is, but it worries me that the CofE has put a lot of work into developing the Pioneer Ministry stream (both Lay and Ordained) perhaps assuming that once they have started new things they will cease to be pioneers and become Pastors... I just wonder how sustainable it is to wind up all these Pioneers if we are going to sooner or later squeeze them into being something they are not?
Technorati Tags: Church of England: Entrepreneurship: Fresh Expressions: Leadership: Pioneer Ministry
yeh - that's interesting because that is one of my concerns.
I have already found myself saying to people 'I am not your pastor' as I am here to create ... pastoring must be the responsibility of someone else.
During training at SEITE I said this and got laughed at. I was told I was making excuses and avoiding the issue. It's good to hear you saying the same sort of stuff - I was starting to think maybe I needed to start to think about changing my ideas with the thought process being something like ... after all I have connected with with this group of people and we are starting to gather regularly ... some of them need a pastor and so maybe I should think about this. I keep thinking but I keep coming up with the answer that that is still not me!
Your last comment is a worry for me already - I think I have already come to the thinking that if they try to squeeze me into a pastor mode then I will have to resist - however costly that resistance will end up being!
thanks for your thoughts Mark cos they ahve helped today in making me feel less of a misfit than usual .... but still a misfit and quite proud of it! :-)
Posted by: Rob | 14/09/2009 at 17:01
Hi Mark, I feel your pain! I think that this is really only answered by what some call the 'missionary' imperative, in other words always looking for someone to take on your role, constantly trying to give someone else your job basically. In missionary terms its looking for indigenous leaders. It goes against the prevailing culture in church circles, where a 'minister' is a job for life, a pioneer like you or perhaps even me, ought to be able to pioneer, without the need to settle into a position of management. The problem is that pioneers are hard to fund, and so there is a school of thought which says 'fund the pioneering stage externally, until the pioneer can become the manager and fund themself.' That too is problematic.
Bless you mate, I hope things pick up for you.
Posted by: Simon | 14/09/2009 at 17:59
I'm with Simon on this that perhaps part of pioneering is to find those to do the work of continuing in one piece of pioneering work so that you can then begin more new work of a pioneering nature in the same region.
On a personal level I'd ask you when you last went on retreat and what your spiritual director says about it? If it's hard to answer those I know the traditional models might not be quite your style but having someone exploring your spiritual journey and your ministerial journey with you is invaluable, whatever form that may take.
Posted by: Sarah Brush | 14/09/2009 at 18:54
I hear your pain. :-( For myself, I've had odd wonderings of late about the whole 'pastor' thing, period! What I mean is, why do we inevitably need someone else to take on the role of caring for us all? Why isn't that a shared responsibility of the group, perhaps with a lead role (but NOT the only role) played by those whom God has given gifts of pastoral care. Instead we seem to fall into the expectation that a 'professional' is required to do it for the group. I'm becoming more persuaded by the idea that the only 'professionals' we should be paying are midwives of the new thing, or those working in marginalized groups which will never have the (emotional, spiritual) resources to support themselves.
Posted by: Lindsay Cullen | 14/09/2009 at 22:42
100% agree Linz... That's part (one part of several) why I believe ordination is in need of a complete overhaul/reimagining and whilst I welcome the idea of Puoneer Ministers I don't think the thinking is radical enough... it's been focussed on curriculum not the deeper questions about ordination itself... George Herbert is alive and well! :( it seems we cannot move beyond his understanding of the lifelong, proffesional, one man ministry which I believe to be unhealthy for the individual, for the parish, for the Church and for culture.
Posted by: Mark | 15/09/2009 at 10:20
I think that we should all swap jobs for a month, get stuck into someone else's fresh expression. This would give is the constant challenge that we need and awesome feed back for both our own projects and the ones we have visited. It would also make sure that the projects that are running do not become ours !!! which is an inherent danger, that we think because we are the only ones doing "whatever", that we begin to think we are the experts !
Posted by: ben norton | 15/09/2009 at 11:52
Mark it would be really good if you could start a discussion on this on the Fresh Expressions Facebook page. It's a vital issue and needs lots of thought.
Posted by: www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=681477990 | 15/09/2009 at 17:30
Happy to post a link and start the discussion Norman :)
Posted by: Mark | 15/09/2009 at 17:42
Hi Mark - a bit late to the party on this discussion, but I'm being drawn into the Pioneer placement issue here and share your concerns.
I'm not sure we are setting out to make Pioneers pastors, but I don't detect we are being 'smart' enough around understanding the gift / personality of the pionner being selected. It seems to me we have 2 ends of continuum:
- at one end, someone who is a total entrepenuer - a start up person who's gifts lie in that and building local leadership and then moving on to the next new church to be birthed.
- at the other end we have the gardener time person who sees their calling and growing and staying for as long as it takes - still building other leaders around them, but in the for long haul.
I think we need to look at where we are placing pioneers and ensuring the local churches have some longer term vision and strategy (not least because of funding implications) and trying to match this to the gifts & personality.
Sorry to hear you are down - look after yourself.
Posted by: Andrew Anderson-Gear | 16/09/2009 at 12:24
thoughtful and appreciate your honesty. i have added some thoughts on my blog, having done pioneering and pastoring for a while.
http://tinyurl.com/qjeldz
steve
Posted by: steve taylor | 16/09/2009 at 22:57
Very helpful Steve thanks
Posted by: Mark | 16/09/2009 at 23:18
Angela Jenner posted the following on the Facebook discussion, which captures some of my current thinking...
When things reach a stage which seems more settled and the sense of call to that place remains, I wonder. I would imagine there is a possibility of a strong undercurrent of dis-ease.
Is this a point where a pioneer may need to throw the leadership balls into waiting (even if reluctant) hands in order to move back towards the liminal place where vision is more acute, and prophetic action more possible. Remembering that it is at the edge of the known, where risks are high, that organic organisms grow most prolifically.
Posted by: Mark | 17/09/2009 at 00:10
I think your observation is spot on. Some are gifted for initiating and some are gifted for sustaining. I do think that the initiators are in the spotlight at present. Pioneering appears to be the more romantic role at present (although having done both I know that the shine gets knocked off that apple pretty quickly when you are the pioneer.)
I suspect we know which we really are by how much it feels that we are swimming upstream when we are doing it.
Posted by: Jim | 17/09/2009 at 12:24
The most effective organisations are the ones where the workers know - and stay within - their areas of core ability... God designe dthe church to be a body where eyes don't try to be feet.
Perhaps it is the responsibility of the pioneer (if they want to remain a pioneer) to remember to build a team around them so that as soon as the pioneering is done there is a team of managers already working on the sustaining and growing. By my own argument it should really be the elders/overseers/some other role that (within THEIR core skills) releases a team around the pioneer - or sends out with the pioneer in the first place... but in the unfortunate reality of most situations I guess the pioneers will have to do this or risk being forced into areas that are not their core - and god given abilities...
Posted by: joel toombs | 17/09/2009 at 13:23
great post Mark, cheers.
can totally relate.
which is why, after three years at feig in Gloucester, I left.
not in a heartless way - it was just that the community needed me to get out of the way so that they could mature. and I, like you, needed a new challenge.
Whilst there, I was definitely a pastor as well as a pioneer - but there are other pastors in the community too...
Posted by: michael volland | 18/09/2009 at 12:23