I don't want to add much more comment to this sad situation, but when there are updates as significant as this I will post them... C. Peter Wagner writes...
Todd Bentley now carries the label of a liar and a deceiver. I'm sorry to mention it, but I felt personally deceived in the same way when Ted Haggard's sin was exposed and he was immediately removed from ministry...... the latter part of this reminds me very much of the stories that emerge from situations that have turned Cultic, even if they began with good intentions and did some good stuff... (for example, in my own "tradition" the infamous case of the "Nine O'Clock Service") Good work can be undone by poor accountability and an abusive and controlling character at the centre... this happens time and time again, why do some people ignore the warnings of others, why do we never seem to learn? Note again though that in the full document (found here this has now been confirmed as a direct e-mail from Peter Wagner) no criticism is levelled at those (including Wagner himself!) who talked of holding Bentley in "Alignment" and accountability... quite the opposite in fact!Suffice it to say that there is more than I am going to mention. First of all, Todd has been removed from public ministry until further notice. He has resigned from the ministry he founded, Fresh Fire, so he is no longer a part of that board. It has become clear that he indulged in periodic drunkenness. He has no intention at the moment of reconciling with Shonna, nor does she with him. Their marriage has been torn for years by his emotional attachment with at least one other female whose physical contact went beyond hugging and kissing and holding hands. Enough said-maybe more details will be revealed later-but it was clearly immoral. All of this was skillfully concealed by lying and by swearing close associates who had observed his behavior to secrecy.
Wagner, unlike Arnott admits that he, and the "apostles" where well aware that "chaos and confusion had begin to invade the Outpouring" but he went against the warnings of the others...
I concluded that the best protocol was to do the alignment first, then deal with the issues that had been raised. My other friends disagreed and urged me to deal with Todd's problems first then do the alignment. I respected their point of view and I was very sorry that I had to follow God's leading for me personally instead of taking their advice. It was not a comfortable decision.Typically then, he passes the blame for his mistakes on to God, rather than taking any personal responsibility (It's not my fault, God told me to!)... He goes on...
Stephen Strader, who has been keeping records, affirms that the evil that the prince of the power of the air had been subtly introducing into the Outpouring I started to be exposed and unraveled the day after the alignment, June 24!Some questions then... if that is correct and accurate what then was the "Chaos and confusion" that so worried Strader that he felt he needed to bring in Wagner in the first place? And what where the "problems" that Wagner and his friends where debating before the 24th June? Hmmm there's a bucket full of contradiction there as far as I can see!
I'll be honest with you, there is so much inconsistency in the statements from all the "apostles" involved (Strade, Joyner, Arnott and Wagner in particularly!) I can't help but question what exactly went on. Dutch Sheets, part of the Prophetic/Charismatic movement is worried about it too... he calls for more honesty from the leaders involved (statement found here) ....
Did leaders handling the Lakeland situation make mistakes? Yes- huge mistakes. Beyond the obvious fruit of salvations and healings, can good come from Lakeland, as some have suggested, even with the recent revelations concerning Todd Bentley? Yes, but only if there is complete honesty and transparency, the removal of all attempts at self-preservation, and absolute humility from all sidesSheets goes on to make the following challenges to his peers...Some of my closest friends endorsed and participated in the Lakeland meetings. For them I have both criticism-all of us lose credibility at this point if we're not completely honest-and affirmation. Should they have been more discerning and have listened to the warnings they received? Obviously. Should those who "aligned" Todd with spiritual fathers (which was a good thing and positioned him to receive help if he chooses to accept it) have realized to do so publicly was a mistake and could be interpreted by those watching in no other way than as a complete endorsement? Yes, they should have, especially when the event became a commissioning ceremony, complete with decrees and prophecies of going to higher levels, predictions of Todd's increasing world-wide influence and leading a world-wide revival, emphatic and prolific endorsements of his character, etc. How could those watching believe the evening was anything but an aligning, endorsing and commissioning ceremony? It was. It really doesn't matter who laid their hands on Todd-all share responsibility.
1 - We, the leaders of the charismatic community, have operated in an extremely low level of discernment. Frankly, we often don't even try to discern.I don't want anyone to play the "Blame game" but we what we do need is for all folk involved to be honest about the situation and humble enough to face up to the mistakes they made, innocent or otherwise... if they won't it will all happen again far too soon!2 - We, the leaders of the charismatic church, spin our involvement and fail to acknowledge our responsibility when other leaders fall- all of which stems from our self-preservation and pride.
3 - Our procedures and standards of accountability are incredibly inadequate. We have provided camaraderie, not biblical accountability.
4 - We, the leaders of the charismatic church, have built on hype, sensation, innovation, programs, personality and charisma.
Technorati Tags: Florida: Todd Bentley
All this is - oh so very sad. For Todd's & Shona's three children, I pray. Thank you Mark for keeping a gracious and balanced blog/update on what will probably be a very sober and tricky time for the charismatic church. The repercussions could be enormous? May God grant us all deep wisdom to learn from this.
Posted by: Sally T | 27/08/2008 at 13:37
good summary and very helpful. when you get time, could you put a link or two in the post? love to see the originals.
great to see you at greenbelt last week.
Posted by: andrew | 28/08/2008 at 13:43
Thanks Andrew...
Wagners statement came from here... http://pastorburt.lifewithchrist.org/permalink/42895.html
Sheets from here...
http://www.dutchsheets.org/index.cfm
Posted by: Mark | 28/08/2008 at 13:53
I've noticed that we all (not just charismatics) tend to glorify a little too much leaders with an independent spirit (just because they are usually so radical that they can draw a crowd), failing to see how unwise men/women are who are unwilling to listen to others (we are blind to this glaring weakness untill it is too late... and then the independents are left to "independently" fend for themselves and carry all the guilt and shame).
Posted by: Emily | 28/08/2008 at 17:02
Indeed, in these days of "celebrity worship" it's hard to resist that particular pull just as the Church has failed to resist the pull into consumerism... people rush to be associated with the next big thing, and then rush as fast as they can away when it all goes tits up!...
One of our community went to Florida, & when it turned out that Bentley was not going to appear that night, he said, a good percentage of the "congregation" got up and left... at which point the stewards where told to get to the doors quickly to collect the leaving peoples offerings before they could get out!
Also we (the church) seem to be desperate for success, however we interpret that (church growth, signs and wonders, large networks and empires, etc.) and it seems to me that the Charismatic church in the UK in particular has been yearning for the next big thing since Toronto and I think God TV gave them a glimmer of hope, something to cling to... and there was/is a willingness to check theology at the door in the fear of missing out on what God/The Spirit might be doing.
Posted by: Mark | 28/08/2008 at 17:28
As a charismatic, I have to say that it was blatently obvious to me from the start that Todd Bentley was a lying heretic. It is beyond my comprehension that so many people, including leaders, were taken in by him.
However, it is also worth noting that most, if not all, of the high-profile charismatic leaders in the USA (including those you mention - Joyner, Arnott, Wagner and Sheets) are themselves false teachers and should be avoided.
This is not the charismatic movement I knew 20 years ago, nor do I wish to be associated with it.
Posted by: Anon | 28/08/2008 at 18:09
Mark, see what I have written on the same subject on my blog, at http://www.qaya.org/blog/?p=652. I don't want to entirely defend Peter Wagner as I think his public criticism of Todd is based on partial information. But I agree with you that "Good work can be undone by poor accountability". And that is why I defend Wagner's decision to ensure that there was a proper relationship of accountability between Todd and the "apostles" before trying to sort out the mess. It was perhaps a mistake to do this publicly, but maybe that was the only way that Todd would accept it.
Once good accountability was established, the "apostles" went into action, and indeed Wagner made the first public statement on their behalf on 11th August, linked to in my post. Sadly matters seem to have got out of control before they could be resolved, but at least the good accountability is now providing a way in which the situation can be resolved, as Todd meets with Bill Johnson this coming weekend.
It is of course sad that many worldly Christians have turned Todd into a celebrity, and added to the pressures on him. But you can't blame Todd for that any more than you can blame Jesus for the way the crowds made a celebrity of him, and then a few days later deserted him and called for him to be crucified. I don't say this to make a parallel between Jesus and Todd, just to establish the general principle that crowds are fickle.
Posted by: Peter Kirk | 28/08/2008 at 18:29
Thanks for the comment Peter, I've been reading your posts on the sad story... I think we would agree on much - though coming at it from a slightly different angle. It is clear from Wagners statement that he was aware of problems before the "alignment" (which lets be honest was more of a coronation!) but he decided to go against the wisdom of others (including it seems John Kilpatrick) for me the cries of ignorance from the "apostles" just doesn't wash, Strader and Joyner both say that things had been wrong for some considerable time (years if you believe them) and Bentley's "theology" has always been out there for anyone to see (e.g. his love in with Patricia King and Bob Jones, his changing story about the Angel Emma)... so I only partially buy into the idea that this has all come out "because" of the accountability of the "apostles", to be honest I struggle with all of the statements because they focus almost solely on the Marital issue and not on the rest i.e. the theology, the finances, the hype-based methodology, the role of God TV etc. etc... and TBH I think in this age of Global warming it's high time that the Charismatic leadership took a stand against this whole idea of having to fly halfway across the globe to receive the Holy Spirit!
re. the celebrity thing, yes I think Bentley shares much of the "blame" - he IMHO courted the praise and the adulation, I posted my fears of a "messiah complex" before the fan got soiled! He set himself up on the pedestal, it is no surprise that others upheld him there. I was very pleased to read Sheets comments, I think he has hit the nail on the head.
Wagners statement reads awfully like a desperate attempt to squirm out of any responsibility to me... to say nothing of calling Bentley (and others) a "loser"! very strange!
Posted by: Mark | 28/08/2008 at 19:21
Thanks for the reply. I differ from you mostly in that I see nothing fundamentally wrong with Todd's theology, just a few places where he needs a bit more balance. It is also well known, public knowledge before Lakeland, that Todd had a difficult time a few years ago and had to be restored to ministry. I don't know if it was actually public that another woman was involved; the insiders certainly knew, but considered this to be in the past and forgiven.
The new personal issues that arose this year seem to have been revealed clearly to the insiders only after 23rd June. The issue which Strader identified before that date, and the reason why he brought in the "apostles", was nothing to do with these personal matters, but was that "disorder reigned, and many of the Lakeland doctrines as well as practices were being called into question on an international scope", part of the careful description in Wagner's statement of 11th August at http://pastorburt.lifewithchrist.org/permalink/42752.html of why the "apostles" got involved.
Wagner and his fellow "apostles" are still working on these non-marital issues, about which you are rightly concerned. See the last section of his latest statement where he explains what "the Lakeland Outpouring Apostolic Team" is now doing. He is careful to distinguish between the personal and organisational issues, and so should we be.
Posted by: Peter Kirk | 28/08/2008 at 21:04
Wagner the wingnut!! Honestly, while i was not a fan of what was happening at Lakeland i think its pretty horrid how people like Peter C the 'apostle' have been reacting. Yes Todd may have lied and deceived but perhaps like Dutch Sheets has partially done, Wagner should at least accept his own complete inability to discern what was right or wrong in this whole fiasco. Alignment? God's leading? phhhhht
In light of this and the Healer debacle in Australia it has been a sad few weeks for 'Christians,' in ministry and i cannot help but be really disheartened right now
Posted by: ally simpson | 28/08/2008 at 23:00
Todd Bentley is an evil man. As a Christian, I CAN NOT believe that there are people as gullible as the ones who would support such an obviously deranged human. I really feel sorry for the Christians who are constantly looking for that "high" just to keep going....REST in the Lord. Go to your own pastors and seek guidance before falling into such obvious lunacy!!!
Posted by: Terri | 28/08/2008 at 23:58
Peter, we'd certainly disagree on the particulars of Theology... but that's OK.
I think there are five areas that raise concerns for me... 1) the theological issues (e.g. the kingly anointing of Bentley as the only way to open the gates of heaven - more than a "balance" question for me) along with the Gnostic tendencies and more bizzare Bob Jones/KCP stuff 2) the methodological issues e.g. the hype and psychological techniques used (along with the claims, eg. resurrections which Bentley kept saying where documented, but has been unable to provide any) 3) the question of personal/family issues - which we now know about (and (NB) Joyner says that he knew about before June, but perhaps he doesn't talk to Wagner et al.) and all in "ministry" need to heed! 4) the structural issues - e.g. there has been little comment about financial concerns that have been raised and 5) the role of the "apostles" in holding Bentley accountable... which is what most of my post-fall out posts have been about.
I don't want to judge Bentley personally in the way that some seem to want to do (especially the personal issues) - there but for the grace of God go I - but I do want to ask questions that apply to the whole body, about theology, accountability, support etc. I hope this situation will end up as a blessing for the Charismatic church, I feel if it is able to take on board the critique from within, especially that of Dutch Sheets then it may be a bright day for its future... and I hope that Wagner has learned something about the importance of the communion of saints!
Posted by: Mark | 29/08/2008 at 00:38
As an evangelical Charismatic I am dissapointed by this news. I seriously question the credibility of the so called Prophetic Movement. I also question the credibility of all of the so called 'apostles' or well known leaders involved (the names mentioned above as well as others not mentioned). I think that the whole movement has gone wrong. I use to check out once in a while a church in my area that was openly invovled with this whole florida revival and todd bentley himself. I went with an open mind. Now I will probably never go back to it as well as any churches like it. Sure I'm still a charismatic theologically but not that kind of charismatic.
Posted by: Jay | 29/08/2008 at 06:15
Travelling to see a MAN in Florida. Desiring the blessing of MAN. Believing in MAN. Whenever I read stuff about some 'outpouring' (I don't even know what that is) or this mega-ministry, I see/read MAN, MAN, MAN rather that CHRIST, CHRIST, CHRIST. WE are getting caught up in ourselves and others rather than our Lord and Saviour. That should be our first warning sign. Secondly, accountability should be at the forefront of any leaders ministry and modeled to those they lead. Novel thought: ask one of them to be an accountability partner? Given how often this happens in the Church and not, accountability should be at the start not worked out later.
Posted by: MK | 29/08/2008 at 07:16
'It is of course sad that many worldly Christians have turned Todd into a celebrity, and added to the pressures on him. But you can't blame Todd for that any more than you can blame Jesus for the way the crowds made a celebrity of him...'
That strikes me as more than a little naive, Peter. A simple "no" to GodTV might have made the world of difference.
Hi, Mark.
Posted by: graham | 29/08/2008 at 20:39
I am always dissapointed when after an avent such as this many people get on the bandwagon of reaction instead of action to heal and restore the damage done by sin in the camp. We must think of this as the enemy having won a round, pick ourselves up and never forget that it is people involved and not things. Todd needs help his family need help and we have all learned once again never to place so much emphasis on people and names, only Christ an His Kingdom.
Posted by: Pastor Brian Briggs | 29/08/2008 at 20:51
Brian, IMHO part of the healing is about learning the lessons - I'm talking mainly about accountability, discernment, use of the media, theological issues not the specific personal marital issues for the Bentley Family.
It does get frustrating when if you raise concerns while the situation was ongoing you are told not to doubt God's action and that any criticism is doing the Devil's work... then when your worst fears come true you are told - we shouldn't raise the problems etc.
yes we need to allow the Bentley's time to work through their personal mess (which we all have to some extent) but we also need to reflect on why it all went wrong... and TBH I think the sex thing is a presenting issue and that there are deeper problems in Christendom (especially in this case in the Charismatic/Pentecostal/Prophetic part of it) notably it's complete adoption of consumerism (God's purpose is to bless *me*) and celebrity culture... I hope that in the future the leaders involved in this sad situation will not be so quick to dismiss the concerned and critical voices as simple nay-sayers nor so hasty in jumping into the reflected glory of a "star"!
Posted by: Mark | 29/08/2008 at 21:09
Mark, thanks for this. I have found it very informative.
Posted by: Matt Stone | 29/08/2008 at 21:35
Graham, why should Todd have said "no" to God TV and the chance to get his message to millions? What preacher would turn down the chance to preach to a wider audience? Should a preacher do so? Should Billy Graham have refused to appear on TV etc to avoid becoming a personality? Should your pastor refuse to preach because even being in the pulpit of a small church makes him or her a local celebrity? Should Jesus have refused to preach to the crowds because they were making a celebrity of him?
Posted by: Peter Kirk | 29/08/2008 at 21:39
Peter, I think there is a difference between a pastor ministering to a local "flock" and the whole hyped up coverage of God TV which no doubt was a major factor in both the Celebrity problem of Lakeland and the attendance. I think there is a problem when the "preacher" becomes the draw (inc. Billy Graham IMHO) and when people start talking about "his message" not God's... and especially when he/she is allowed to believe their own hype... and the hype of the TV company, who have done very nicely out of the whole affair!
Posted by: Mark | 29/08/2008 at 22:04
'Should your pastor refuse to preach because even being in the pulpit of a small church makes him or her a local celebrity?'
Well, I haven't got a pastor, but I think you're missing the point. If it meant my pastor would have to be on stage night after night and be made into a Christian global celebrity, then, yes, I think he probably should turn down the opportunity.
You seem to be implying that a preacher shouldn't, under any circumtances, turn down an opportunity to preach. Yet, taking the example of Jesus that you brought up, I see him doing this repeatedly.
However, my comment was a direct response to your suggesting that Todd can't be blamed for the added pressures of celebrity that were placed on him. My comment should be read in that light, as a response to what I described as you naivete. (It strikes me as analogous to someone going on Big Brother and later complaining about the pressures of fame. Most of us recognise that these things go hand in hand and that you don't get the benefits without the burdens.)
Posted by: graham | 30/08/2008 at 01:17
Graham and Mark, I understand your concerns. But let us suppose that Todd's primary concern was to get his message out to as many people as possible. Is that a wrong aim for a preacher? In order to do this he agreed to take nightly meetings, go on God TV etc. Of course he realised or should have done many of the pressures that would result, although they may have wildly exceeded his expectations as did the general worldwide response. Perhaps he should have been a bit more careful. But I don't think it is fair to load him with the primary blame for a problem caused by others just because he didn't anticipate it as well as he might have done. Like Graham's Big Brother contestant, Todd has no right to complain, and he is not doing so. But the Big Brother contestant is not to blame for all the ills of Big Brother.
Posted by: Peter Kirk | 30/08/2008 at 13:34
Really, really good article. More shaking off of bad fruit will happen I think and in some ways the TB episode has done a lot of people a favour. No more will people believe in Celebrity Christianity or Man-God. Perhaps people will even turn back to the simple living that Christ lived and leave the building, guided by (the) Holy Spirit. Thank you God that the TB show never got it's claws fully into the UK, you knew it would have been a disaster.
Posted by: helen-cornwall | 30/08/2008 at 22:42
Peter, I don't really want to apportion blame and I certainly don't want to say anyone bears "primary blame" for the whole celebrity thing... one can blame Charismatic Christendom, Modern culture, The media (inc. God TV), the Fresh Fires trustees, the "Apostles" etc. etc. I think the important thing is to learn the lessons. We have and do use the Media (Radio 4 are making a programme about us at the moment) but we have and do ask probing questions of the media and ourselves and always seek guidance from those to whom we are accountable... we have on several occasions turned down the national media (I was approached by *7* TV companies back when we started and was asked if I was interested in taking part in Channel 4's current series "Make me a Christian")... so it's not that the media is necessarily a bad thing, rather that we need to think very seriously about the effect it has to what we are doing, to us as a community and as individuals.
Posted by: Mark | 31/08/2008 at 21:18
http://witnessed.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/if/
Posted by: His servant | 03/09/2008 at 05:30
Simple solution. As a christian you should kill him. In OT god punish people for that kind of sin in that way.
Posted by: teshsoch | 06/09/2008 at 19:39
How very mature!
Posted by: Mark | 07/09/2008 at 09:33
I knew from day one, that this was going to happen sooner or later. How did I know? I knew last year that Todd Bentley had demons in him. And how did I know that? God does not go against His Word. You cannot disobey the Word of God and be in His Will. But this stuff goes on in the church world every single day. Is it any wonder that people laugh at us?
Posted by: smbga | 10/09/2008 at 10:36
I started in an 'ultra-charismatic' church that took in all the teachings of this kind of apostolic and prophetic movement until I realised that there is something seriously wrong about the doctrines that guide the lives of these 'self-termed' apostles and prophets. I urge our charismatic brethren to seriously re-examine and re-evaluate these teachings. The problem is not that scriptures are not quoted but they are interpreted so loosely and way out of context to suit the personal liking and intentions of those involved in the movement.
Posted by: Lee Yik Sheng | 14/09/2008 at 03:15