I have spent a few moments this evening looking at some of the extreme anti-emerging church/contemplative spirituality etc, sites (it was either that or "Big Brother"!) and I've noticed a common thread... apart from the pervading atmosphere of fear (I got the impression, at times that they believe satan to be more powerful than God?!) they all seem to call themselves researchers... As I am currently undertaking my MA research this is a word whose meaning I feel fairly confident of... yet I see few signs of research (as I understand it) on these sites; a lot of polemic and guilt by association and assumption definitely, for example...
Why Does Eugene Peterson use the phrase "as above, so below" in his paraphrase The Message? Did he know about Ronald Miller's book, As Above, So Below? And if he did know about this well-known New Age title, does he agree with that book when it says:
"The spiritual dimension of culture is not an array of dogmatic world views ... but a spectrum of contemplative practices."( p. 3) or when it quotes Aldous Huxley as saying that mysticism is the "highest common factor" that unites all the world's religions and helps people to recognize their divinity within.(p.2) [from lighthouse trails "research"]
So use of a common grouping of words evidences tacit agreement... Anyway, I am sure these folk are genuine in their beliefs and I have had a number of discussions with anti-emergent folk... They hold their beliefs and I can respect them for that, but why do these sites use the term research? The research seems to be reading a few books by writers that they agree with and doing a bit of cross-referencing... that is not research as I know it! Perhaps they could try these definitions on for size? [from www.wordiq.com]
Basic research (also called fundamental or pure research) has as its primary objective the advancement of knowledge and the theoretical understanding of the relations among variables. It is exploratory and often driven by the researcher’s curiosity, interest or hunch. It is conducted without a practical end in mind although it can have unexpected results that point to practical applications.
Applied research is done to solve specific, practical questions; its primary aim is not to gain knowledge for its own sake. It is almost always done on the basis of basic research.
Surely research has at it's heart the critiquing of theory not the practice of looking for things which simply reinforce existing opinions and assumptions? So, why use the term? Would it be harsh to suggest it is to add an air of authority to their pronouncements and the books they sell?
Out of interest some of the things/people they condem as "evil" [their word]; Brian MaClaren (obviously), Thomas Merton (not surprisingly), Eugene Peterson (and The Message in particular), Rick Warren (and Church growth theories etc.), Labyrinths, Julian of Norwich, The Alpha Course (because it might lead to catholicism??? apparently Nicky Gumbel opnce met the Pope, and some Catholic churches do Alpha courses! Oh and according to one site, the God, Jesus, HS, etc.etc taught by Alha are not the "real" biblical ones), Youth Specialities, Willow Creek, Tony Campolo, contemplative spirituality (apparently the premise of C.S. is that all paths lead to God and it refutes the gospel message of the Cross!?), Catholics, well pretty much everyone apart from those whose books they sell!
: comments :